Chord progressions vs. Chord loops

[Nekujak]

While the title of this video is somewhat clickbaity, it actually presents an interesting analysis, comparing how pop songs used to be written vs how they tend to be written today, or put another way... chord progressions vs. chord loops.

From a theory perspective, the bit about reframing chord functions within chord loops is pretty interesting.

​

 

[AWWJ]

Changing a Major to a minor now and then is a nice effect, but if the singer doesn't hit the minor... what's the point?

Besides... What does any of that matter if nobody here is actually working on "Songwriting and Producing"?

 

[Polkasound]

I found it interesting too. It's a unique take on how pop music has evolved. I think chord loops work so well in pop music for the same reason we have 4 beats in a measure and 8-bar sections — mental comfort. When it comes to contemporary pop music, you're safe creating a song that does not deviate too far from an expected chord path, and that's what chord loops do. They keep pop songs on a comfortable circular trajectory, which helps when there's so much else going on in them.

I think the I-vi-IV-V chord progression of the 1950s had the same effect. Back then, you were safe creating a song that followed that progression because pop music fans were attuned to it. It was ear comfort.

...but if the singer doesn't hit the minor... what's the point?

Well, for one thing, you become officially qualified to sing in a polka band.

 

[AWWJ]

Well, for one thing, you become officially qualified to sing in a polka band.

Lol... Talk about "Loopy"